In New South Wales, common assault carries a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment and/or a fine of 50 penalty units. This offence often applies when an individual assaults another person without causing injuries that amount to actual bodily harm (e.g., bruising or scratches) or grievous bodily harm (e.g., loss of sight, complex fractures, or injuries necessitating surgery).
Table of Contents
What is Common Assault in NSW?
Under Section 61 of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) common assault refers to the unlawful act of inflicting fear of immediate physical harm or actual physical harm on another person, without their consent. It does not necessarily require physical contact—the mere threat or act of intimidation can constitute common assault if it causes the victim to fear harm.
For example, raising a fist towards someone in a threatening manner can be considered common assault, even if no physical contact occurs. At law, this distinction separates “battery” (actual physical contact) from “assault” (the apprehension of physical contact).
Examples of Common Assault:
Physical acts: Punching, hitting, slapping, pushing, or kicking another person.
Threatening gestures: Raising a fist as if to strike.
Spitting: Spitting on another person.
Verbal threats: Threatening to harm someone physically.
Throwing objects: Hurling items like bottles at another person, regardless of contact.
Physical restraint: Holding someone against their will.
Legal Framework in NSW
The Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) provides the foundation for prosecuting common assault cases. To establish common assault, the prosecution must prove:
Intent: The accused intended to cause harm or fear.
Unlawfulness: The act was not justified, such as in cases of self-defence.
Immediate Threat: The fear or harm caused was immediate.
Types of Common Assault
Common assault can manifest in different forms:
Physical Assault
Any intentional act of physical force that results in minor injuries or discomfort, such as a slap or shove.
Non-Physical Assault
Acts or threats that instil a genuine fear of harm in the victim, even without physical contact.
Severity of Common Assault vs. Other Offences
Common assault is less serious than offences such as assault occasioning actual bodily harm (AOABH) or grievous bodily harm (GBH), which involve physical injuries. However, it is not uncommon for police to charge an individual with AOABH for conduct that aligns more closely with common assault.
The distinction between these charges can have significant legal implications:
Common Assault: Maximum penalty of 2 years imprisonment.
AOABH: Maximum penalty of 5 years imprisonment.
A clear understanding of these distinctions is crucial for negotiations with prosecutors and may significantly influence sentencing outcomes.
Jurisdiction: Which Court Will Hear the Case?
Common assault cases are usually dealt with in the Local Court, where the maximum penalty is 2 years imprisonment and/or 20 penalty units. However, either the prosecution or the defence can elect to have the matter heard in the District Court, which retains the same maximum penalty for common assault but handles more serious criminal matters overall.
Elements the Prosecution Must Prove
For a person to be convicted of common assault, the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that:
The accused applied physical force or threatened immediate violence.
The action was done intentionally or recklessly.
The action occurred without the victim’s consent.
The action was conducted without lawful excuse.
Possible Defences to Common Assault
Defending a common assault charge involves challenging the prosecution’s case or presenting a lawful excuse for the alleged conduct. Potential defences include:
Self-Defence: The accused acted to protect themselves or another person from harm.
Accident: The act occurred unintentionally without reckless behaviour.
Duress: The accused was coerced into committing the act.
Youth and Development: The accused was under the age of 14 and lacked the capacity to understand their actions fully.
Practical Implications
Understanding the nuances of common assault is essential for ensuring the best possible outcome in legal proceedings. Whether negotiating with prosecutors or preparing a defence, recognising the distinctions between common assault and more serious charges like AOABH can significantly affect the severity of penalties.
Legal advice and representation are crucial for navigating these cases effectively, especially where the prosecution’s interpretation of evidence could escalate charges unjustly. If you need legal assistance, reach out to Byron Lawyers Group for expert guidance and support in Blacktown, Sydney.
Comments